subject
Social Studies, 29.06.2019 14:20 kam110800

several years ago, mark was arrested for participating in a crime. since then, he has been confined to a mental hospital, even though he was given a prison sentence. mark is periodically evaluated to see if he is still mentally ill. if it is determined that he is no longer mentally ill, mark will then be incarcerated to serve out his prison sentence. from your knowledge of mental health and the law, you would correctly state that mark was originally found

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:20
About political condition and history of nepal
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Aman is charged a fee by the city for having numerous broken cars and auto parts in his front yard. which of the following correctly best describes why the city punish him? he has committed a crime. he is in violation of a city statute. he has violated an amendment of the u.s. constitution. a judge has decided that he is in violation of civil law.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the than freud had allowed.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:50
Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
several years ago, mark was arrested for participating in a crime. since then, he has been confined...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 25.06.2019 05:30
Questions on the website: 13722360