Which statement would a federalist be most likely to agree with?

The federal government should be stronger than individual state governments.

Explanation:that would be c

D. The constitution should be adopted without changes

Explanation:

During the debates to ratify the proposed constitution (1787), the Federalists were the political group that defended it and took action to explain why it should be ratified as it was. They believed that under the new Constitution, the structure of the government was strong enough to lead the nation but was also limited enough so as not to abuse from its power because it was based on the principles of Separation of Powers and Checks and Balances. Therefore, in the beginning, they rejected any attempt to change the Constitution, including the Anti-Federalists' idea of adding a bill of rights that specifically protected people's liberties.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; /// all of the above;