subject
Social Studies, 19.10.2019 04:30 mangustaylor

Which statements about these athletes best demonstrate bias? check all that apply. dante ferris is the best wide receiver in the league. anthony hall has more receptions than cj ramirez. anthony hall has the fewest number of touchdowns. cj ramirez is the worst of these three players. dante ferris has the most receptions and touchdowns. cj ramirez ran for more yards than either ferris or hall.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:20
Read the scenario. samira is a freshman basketball player who hopes to go to college on a basketball scholarship. she is offered the chance to play on her school’s varsity basketball team, which plays in tournaments during holiday breaks. samira usually spends her breaks working at the local hardware store. after careful consideration, samira decides to stay on the freshman basketball team and keep working over breaks.the fact that samira may miss out on a scholarship opportunity by staying on the freshman team illustrates-a cause.-minor consequences.-a trade off.-unexpected risk.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:20
What were two likely reasons that clan chiefs opposed buddhism when it was introduced in japan?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:30
Describe the difference between native american beliefs about land "ownership" and european beliefs. savestylesformat instructions
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which statements about these athletes best demonstrate bias? check all that apply. dante ferris is...
Questions
question
English, 13.01.2021 21:40
question
Medicine, 13.01.2021 21:40
Questions on the website: 13722367