Which answer supports the statement, "the state constitution is more detailed than the u. s. constitution"? a) the u. s. constitution was created after state constitutions had been established. b) the u. s. constitution only exists because the state constitutions allowed it to be created. c) the articles in the state constitution do not deal with amendments like the u. s. constitution does. d) the articles in the state constitution deal with more specific issues than does the u. s. constitution. eliminate

The following answer supports the statement, "The state constitution is more detailed than the U.S. Constitution":

D) The Articles in the state constitution deal with more specific issues than does the U.S. Constitution.

sounds good to me mate!

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.