Why were some framers in favor of incorporating the bill of rights?
because then the bill of rights would cover both state and federal law
because then the bill of rights would protect both citizens and noncitizens
because then the framers would only have to follow the federal laws
because then the framers would only have to follow their state’s laws

Letter A is the correct answer.

The Bill of Rights are a part of the Constitution that wasn't in the original document. This portion was responsible for guaranteeing the U.S people basic rights, such as Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, the right to assembly, and the right to a jury trial. While many framers of the Constitution were against including the Bill of Rights in the document, some framers were in favor of it. These framers were in favor of incorporating the Bill of Rights because then the Bill of Rights would cover both State and Federal Laws.  

Letter A is the correct answer.

The Bill of Rights are a part of the Constitution that wasn't in the original document. This portion was responsible for guaranteeing the U.S people basic rights, such as Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Religion, the right to assembly, and the right to a jury trial. While many framers of the Constitution were against including the Bill of Rights in the document, some framers were in favor of it. These framers were in favor of incorporating the Bill of Rights because then the Bill of Rights would cover both State and Federal Laws.  

Because then the Bill of Rights would cover both state and federal law.

Explanation:

Because then the Bill of Rights would cover both state and federal law.

Explanation:

in an effort to stem the tide of refugees attempting to leave east berlin, the communist government of east germany begins building the berlin wall to divide east and west berlin. construction of the wall caused a short-term crisis in u.s.-soviet bloc relations, and the wall itself came to symbolize the cold war.

its b i looked it up hope u get it right wish u luck