Answers: 2
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:00
Erikson's theory of personality grants more power to the than freud had allowed.
Answers: 2
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 07:00
What extraordinary role does learning think we can play in the universe?
Answers: 1
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:00
Which of the following colonies would most likely have agreed with this stamens the king of england knows what is best for the colonies
Answers: 1
The aggregate is a type of economic...
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 20:50
English, 03.11.2020 20:50
History, 03.11.2020 20:50
English, 03.11.2020 20:50
English, 03.11.2020 20:50
Biology, 03.11.2020 20:50
Biology, 03.11.2020 20:50
Social Studies, 03.11.2020 20:50
Mathematics, 03.11.2020 20:50
English, 03.11.2020 20:50