Which best compares these two selections? 1. henry david thoreau was jailed for refusing to pay poll taxes. he didn't believe in the spanish-american war and refused to support it. 2. "what lies behind you and what lies in front of you, pales in comparison to what lies inside of you." -ralph waldo emerson a) the selections both suggest the significance of always looking forward. b) the selections both caution against the inclination towards conformity. c) the selections both express the consequences for personal nonconformity. d) the selections both present the significance of a personal moral compass.

Which best compares these two selections?

D. The selections both present the significance of a personal moral compass.

Both selections showcase the importance of what is inside of one, what beliefs and thoughts are inside of one. Emerson’s quote points at the strenght of “what lies inside of you”, that is, what constitutes one’s subjectivity, while Thoreau displays a man that stands for what he believes, for what his personal moral compass tell him.

D)The selections both present the significance of a personal moral compass.

Explanation:

The selections both present the significance of a personal moral compass. Students should be able to infer that a personal moral compass is used in reference to a person's ability to judge what is right and wrong and act accordingly. This answer choice is the only one supported by the selections content.

answer; the edward snowden leaks of nsa classified material;

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.