"he shall have power, by and with the advice and consent of the senate, to make treaties, provided two thirds of the senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the advice and consent of the senate, shall appoint ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, judges of the supreme court, and all other officers of the united "
- from section 2, article ii of the constitution of the united states

how is this portion of the u. s. constitution related to the principles of our government?
a) it shows that the president has unlimited power to govern.
b) it shows that the principle of federalism in governing our country.
c) it shows that there are checks and balances in our national government.
d) it shows that the three branches have powers not held by the other two.

What kind of criticism is a poorly delivered criticism that can be hurtful and malicious? criticism is a poorly delivered criticism that can be hurtful and malicious.

What is the subcategory of tournament,pageant,match (used as a noun)

Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.