Social Studies, 22.01.2020 02:31 nikidastevens36

will mark brainlest !
the two maps below show the results of the 2010 gubernatorial election between rick scott (r) and alex sink (d), and the 2008 presidential election between barack obama (d) and john mccain (r). which of the following statements can you prove to be true using this map?

image on left: the graphic shows the results of the 2010 florida gubernatorial election. key, democrat: blue, republican: red. the following cities are listed: tallahassee (democrat), jacksonville (republican), orlando (democrat), tampa (democrat), west palm beach (democrat), miami (democrat). northwest and northeast florida and some of central and southwest florida show republican wins. the area of southeast florida (near miami and west palm beach) show democratic wins. image 2: the graphic shows the results of the 2010 presidential election in florida. key, democrat: blue, republican: red. the following cities are listed: tallahassee (democrat), jacksonville (republican), orlando (democrat), tampa (democrat), west palm beach (democrat), miami (democrat). northwest and northeast florida and some of central and southwest florida show mainly republican wins with democratic wins near tallahassee. the area of southeast florida (near miami and west palm beach) show democratic wins. some areas in central florida (the areas of tampa and orlando) show democratic wins.

a- the geographical distribution of party votes is similar in both elections.
b-the majority of republican voters can be found in central florida.
c-the democrats won the popular vote in both elections.
d-the number of registered republicans in florida increased between 2008 and 2010.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 06:00

One of the results of the 2010 golf of mexico oil spill is the threat to various species in the goths ecosystem it disturbed and in some cases forever altered the of the gulf coast

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 16:30

99 points and brainliestdiscuss two of the major causes of the increasing pollution levels in the yangtze river. make sure to include how they contribute to the water pollution

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 23:40

Research at least one way that your environment influences your health and different ways that you can lessen your negative impact on and improve your environment. describe your findings and cite your sources here answers free

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

will mark brainlest !
the two maps below show the results of the 2010 gubernatorial election...

Questions