subject
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30 KittyLitty

You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking the defendant to the crime scene. the defense claims that dna evidence using str analysis with 13 markers is not sufficient to reliably distinguish between people. what do you think? a. the defense is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 1 million chance of two people having the same pattern, leaving a reasonable doubt. b. str analysis is not sufficient. the defendant's entire genome should be sequenced. the prosecution will have to consult a genomic library to make sure their dna evidence is valid. c. the prosecution is right. str analysis with 13 markers gives a 1 in 10 billion or greater chance that two people will have the same pattern. this person was at the crime scene. d. dna evidence is not generally accepted by legal experts.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Which situation is an example of a citizen participating in a politicial process
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
This refers to weather and atmospheric conditions measured over a long period of time.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:30
Arecent challenge to the european union created by a member state is?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:00
Acharacterized by intimate, long-term, face-to-face association and cooperation. primary group community clique secondary group
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
You are a member of the jury for a murder case. the prosecution has presented dna evidence linking t...
Questions
question
English, 04.10.2021 20:40
question
Chemistry, 04.10.2021 20:40
question
Physics, 04.10.2021 20:40
question
History, 04.10.2021 20:40
Questions on the website: 13722363