Two ways the effect of presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making

In some countries the judge is chosen by the president, this opportunity for the president to having by his side judges that are nominated by him can bring judges aligned with the presidential philosophy that will then work towards his philosophy in their decisions.

Other way a presidential philosophy can impact judicial decision making is by embracing certain values and beliefs, this can give room for new interpretations of the law. Conservative, Liberalism or any political philosophy will suggest how the law must be interpreted, as it is strictly in the constitution or opening it up for new policies.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.

the first question's answer is a.