subject
Social Studies, 26.06.2019 17:00 Emptypockets451

Palanisamy sathasivam was sworn by whom

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
These are pieces of information that are not necessarily the meaning or purpose of writing
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30
Select the correct answer. what was one of the conditions that iraq had to fulfill at the end of the persian gulf war? a. iraq would allow inspections for weapons of mass destruction in the country. b. iraq would accept un peacekeeping forces inside its borders. c. iraq would not attack any other neighboring country. d. iraq would pay for the costs of war damages.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:30
Donald was arrested for murdering an acquaintance. at the trial, donald takes the stand and testifies that he and the victim knew each other. he admits that they would drink and use drugs together. one night while partying, donald explains in his testimony, an argument got out of hand during a card game. donald explains that the victim accused him of cheating and pulled out a knife on him and started swinging it in the air. donald said that he had no choice but to pull out his gun and shoot the victim. the jury convicted donald of manslaughter. who would argue that donald weighed the potential costs and benefits of shooting the victim and decided to pull the trigger as a result of free will? a. a rational choice theorist b. a critical criminologist c. a conflict theorist d. a positivist
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Palanisamy sathasivam was sworn by whom...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2021 17:50
question
Mathematics, 03.12.2021 17:50
Questions on the website: 13722360