subject
Social Studies, 27.06.2019 21:30 jasminetaylor4587

With correct ! scenario 3 federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast information that could threaten the security of the. however, the constitution protects the right to free expression of ideas. judges use past decisions on cases where the law and rights come into conflict to settle similar disputes. a reporter for a national news program is accused of breaking the law. the reporter wrote an article that disapproves of a new federal policy. u. s. officials say the article is unfair and too negative. they say it could upset people and lead some to break laws in protest. the reporter says that news writers have the right to free expression under the constitution. the reporter also says that the article does not promote unlawful action. is this a matter of constitutional, criminal, civil, or military law? is the source of the law a statute, regulation, case law, or a combination? determine the purpose of the. is the law intended to protect people's safety or people's rights? use details from the lesson to support your answer. write in complete sentences. what could happen if the law did not exist? use details from the lesson, including the impact on government officials, to support your answer. write in complete sentences.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:00
Which of the following is one of the innovations that neolithic farmers become more productive? a) plow b) windmill c) tractor d) reaper
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:10
Do you believe kinship relationships still have significance in contemporary america?
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:40
Why does california have the most seats in the house
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
With correct ! scenario 3 federal law requires that news agencies not publish or broadcast informa...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.03.2021 19:50
question
History, 04.03.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 04.03.2021 19:50
question
Mathematics, 04.03.2021 19:50
Questions on the website: 13722361