Which scenario best describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent?

C.

Explanation:

The principle of precedent states that judges must inform their decisions based on previous decisions in similar cases. This ensures that judges are not arbitrary and that the law is consistent. Option C is an example of judges going against the principle of precedent because, even though earlier courts had declared the censoring of newspapers unconstitutional, the federal judge is ruling against this previous decision.

answer; i believe the correct answer is (a) the correlation between the cause variable and outcome variable is zero;

the answer is b, encourage free trade