subject
Social Studies, 29.06.2019 12:30 zacharysharpe2805

In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two groups. subjects in group 1 received the new vaccine while subjects in group 2 received a control vaccine. after the second dose, 132 of 452 subjects in the experimental group (group 1) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. after the second dose, 39 of 103 of the subjects in the control group (group 2) experienced drowsiness as a side effect. does the evidence suggest that a different proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the alpha=0.10 level of significance? determine the null and alternative hypotheses. choose the correct answer below. a. ^ h 0 : p 1 = 0 versus ^ h 0 : p 1 not = 0 b. ^ h 0 : p 1 = p 2 versus ^ h 1 : p 1 not = p 2 c. ^ h 0 : p 1 = p 2 versus ^ h 1 : p 1 < p 2 d. ^ h 0 : p 1 = p 2 versus ^ h 1 : p 1 > p 2 the test statistic z 0 is negative 1.73. (round to two decimal places as needed.) the p-value is 0.084. (round to three decimal places as needed.) what is the result of this hypothesis test? a. reject the null hypothesis because there is not sufficient evidence to conclude that a different proportion of subjects in group 1 experienced drowsiness as a side effect than subjects in group 2 at the alpha=0.10 level of significance.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:30
Which group directly benefits from subsidies? exporters sellers producers importers
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30
Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:20
The president vetoes a bill proposed to become law by congress. in this situation, what happens to the bill?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
During the late 19th century, russia's settlement and development of siberia was made possible by the invention of the
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In randomized, double-blind clinical trials of a new vaccine, monkeys were randomly divided into two...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 22.09.2020 14:01
question
Spanish, 22.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 22.09.2020 14:01
Questions on the website: 13722360