Social Studies, 30.06.2019 15:00 bihanna1234

In miranda v. arizona (1966), why did ernesto miranda say his fifth amendment rights had been violated? he had been stopped and searched without a judge issuing a proper warrant. he had been tried for serious crimes without a grand jury issuing an indictment. he had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination. he had been jailed without being informed of the charges against him.

Answers: 2

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: traceyschmidtk3562

C is the correct answer.

Miranda was interrogated without being informed of his right to an attorney and his right to not incriminate himself.

Answer from: Yoli1117

The answer is option 3: He had confessed to crimes without being reminded of his right to avoid self-incrimination.

The 5th Amendment states that no one will be deprived of life, liberty, or property, or be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself (self-incrimination), without due process of law.

On March 13, 1963, a Phoenix resident, Ernesto Miranda, was arrested for being suspect of r.pe and kidnapping. In the police station, he was questioned by police officers and within two hours, he confessed to committing the crimes. However, in the Court, Miranda alleged that he hadn't been informed of his rights prior to the interrogation, as stated in the 5th and 6th Amendment.

According to these laws, the police should've complied with several procedural safeguards to secure the accused's right. Before giving any confession, the defendant should've been informed that he had the right to have a lawyer present to advise him or that he had the right to remain silent and that anything he said can be used against him in a court of law.

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Answer from: Quest

Apolitical machine ~ apex

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 20:30

How does cloud cover affect how much infrared light is reflected back to the ground?

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00

Mr. mann's science students were experimenting with speed. they set up a 1 meter (100 cm) track. the students used balls instead of cars. the balls were different sizes and made of different materials. four at a time, students rolled balls around the track to see which had the fastest and slowest speeds. some of their data are shown in the table. which ball will take the longest to complete one lap around the track?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:30

Which of the following methods could be considered a "best practice" in terms of informing respondents how their answers to an on-line survey about personal information will be protected? respondents are informed that investigators will try to keep their participation confidential; however, confidentiality cannot be assured.respondents are informed that a research assistant will transfer all the research data to a password-protected computer that is not connected to the internet, via a usb flashdrive. the computer is located in a research team member's office.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain her institution's method for guaranteeing absolute confidentiality of research data.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' ip addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed.the investigator uses the informed consent process to explain how respondent data will be transmitted from the website to his encrypted database without ever recording respondents' ip addresses, but explains that on the internet confidentiality cannot be absolutely guaranteed

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:30

After having your fifteenth candy bar we can assess that you would have? a. negative utility b. high utility c. low utility d. a sixteenth candy bar

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

In miranda v. arizona (1966), why did ernesto miranda say his fifth amendment rights had been violat...

Questions