Social Studies, 30.06.2019 22:00 rhiannonwheatcr5743

Aresearcher has a hypothesis there is a relationship between cancer and stress. he sets out to measure how stressed patients were before they got cancer. he creates a questionnaire asking things like, "did you like your job? ", "did you have a happy home life? ", etc. during the study the researcher noticed that those with higher stress levels before cancer did not get as much asleep as those with lower levels. this leads him to begin measuring how much sleep each person used to get on the average night. he concludes that people with stress did not get much sleep, indicating a relationship between cancer and sleep levels. based on this information, is this study valid? based on this information, is this study valid? a) no, because the researcher did not measure what he claimed to measure (the relationship between cancer and stress levels) b) yes, because the researcher changed his focus based on valid responses from participants c) yes, because the researcher did have a result in the end that showed there was some relationship between two variables. d) no, because a relationship between variables can only be determined by an experiment

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 21.06.2019 21:30

To what extent is the individual shaped by society?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:10

Martin, a 32-year-old human relations administrator at a university, believes that all professors over age 50 are incapable of learning the new educational technologies and are content to keep presenting their same "tired, boring" lectures. he often expresses these views to other administrators and does not encourage any of the "older" faculty members to attend professional development meetings related to new teaching approaches nor does he suggest that the university send them to any of the technology conferences. martin is exhibiting

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:00

In the case of furman v. georgia (1972), the united states supreme court ruled that the death penalty- in specific cases- being arbitrarily and inconsistently imposed, often in a discriminatory manner. as a result, the imposition of the death penalty as a punishment was stopped throughout the united states.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Aresearcher has a hypothesis there is a relationship between cancer and stress. he sets out to measu...

Questions