What is the role of money and how does money facilitate exchange?

Any tool that is entirely trusted in the marketplace both by dealers of goods and services as the amount for those goods and services by lenders as payment for debts.

Money is usually defined in three functions pr services done with it. It serves as a medium of exchange, as a store of value and as a unit of account.

Money's most significant role is as a means of exchange to promote transactions. Without money, all economic activities would have to be accompanied by exchange, which includes direct trade of one good or service for another. The problem with this system is that in order to obtain a specific good or service from a supplier, one has to occupy a good or service of equivalent cost, which the supplier also wants. in a barter system, an interchange can take place only if there is a double parallelism of wants between two transacting persons or parties.

i am not in high school so i don’t know

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: