Which map projection splits the earth's oceans apart for the sake of showing the sizes and shapes of the earth's continents more accurately? a. winkel tripel b. mercator c. political d. goode equal area select the best answer from the choices provided

The correct answer is D. The Goode Equal Area projection splits the Earth's oceans apart for the sake of showing the sizes and shapes of the Earth's continents more accurately.

Explanation:

The Goode Equal Area projection is a cartographic projection that was created by geographer John Paul Goode in 1923.

In 1908, the cartographer expressed in a conference entitled Diabolic Mercator the need to create a more reliable map than the Mercator projection, a fact that he himself would specify 15 years later. This projection is a modification of the projection of Mollweide (also called homolographic), of sinusoidal character, where several meridians are taken as the center and separate projections are made that are then joined in the resulting map, giving a greater sensation of sphericity of the earth's surface. It is an equivalent projection, that is, it maintains the areas in proportion, and pseudo-cylindrical.

The map projection that splits the Earth's oceans apart for the sake of showing the sizes and shapes of the Earth's continents more accurately is "Goode Equal Area"

This is because Goode Equal Area is a type of map projection that is described to be pseudocylindrical in appearance. It is designed to have equal area.

This characteristic makes it capable to reduce the distortion of the world map.

It is designed with numerous interruptions.

It was first developed by John Paul Goode in 1925.

Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option D. "Goode Equal Area."

Learn more here: link

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )