Who believed the judicial branch should interpret the laws? a. john locke b. jean-jacques rousseau c. charles montesquieu d. thomas hobbes

In what way was family life impacted by industrialization? a. there was a rise in the middle class. b. there was a decrease in the birth rate. c. women were not allowed to work in factories. d. families relied on farming for food supplies.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

1. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between homo habilis and australopithecus 2. describe at least 3 similarities or differences between cro-magnon and neanderthals.