Which method is best for archaeologists to use when learning about early cultures that left no written records? question 1 options: they develop theories based on cultures that did leave written records. they look for artifacts that them piece together a general history. they make assumptions based on the current geography of the area where the people lived. they investigate the ruins of other peoples who lived around the same time.

Look at the map of cities in the united states at the turn of the twentish century what impact did railroads have on cities across the united states at the turn of the twentish century

The defendant, angered because a rival gang member had twice beaten him up after school, obtained a heavy lead pipe and waited in a deserted alleyway which he knew the rival took as a route home every day after school. when his enemy came walking down the alley, the defendant leapt out behind him and smashed the pipe into the victim's head, knocking him to the ground. the defendant then rolled the victim over and pounded his face with 15 to 20 heavy blows with the lead pipe, killing him. the jurisdiction defines first degree murder as murder committed with premeditation and deliberation. all other murders are defined as second degree murders. why will the defendant be convicted of first degree murder (as opposed to second degree murder)?

{[ hoi! ]} which was not the name of a french government branch? a. directory b. national convention c. constitution d. national assembly