What is the best definition of unicameral? a representative of the people an agreement by which each party gives up something a government with one legislative body a government with no legislative body

The best definition of unicameral is a government with one legislative body, hence the word "uni". The United States had a unicameral type of legislature but was later changed because all the states had the same number of representations, even though a state has a low or high amount of population. The United States changed from a unicameral to a bicameral legislature, which is composed of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

A unicameral legislature is a government with one legislative body.

Further Explanation:

A unicameral legislature was used by the United States under the Articles of Confederation. During the Articles of Confederation, there was one delegate from each state present at the legislature. These individuals each represented their state and could vote on new laws/amendments to the Articles of Confederation. After the Articles of Confederation failed (more information on that in the "Learn More" category), the United States changed to a bicameral legislature.

Under the current US Constitution, the US has a legislative body that is made up of two houses. This includes the House of Representatives and the Senate. In order for a bill to become a law on a national level, it must pass both parts of the legislature.

Learn More:

Weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation-

Key Details:

Topic: American History, American Government

Grade Level: 7-12

Keywords: Unicameral legislature, Bicameral legislature, Articles of Confederation, US Constitution

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.