Analyze the political cartoon. determine what the artist is arguing in the image. keep in mind our discussions of ethos, pathos, logos, and kairos. how does the artist use these rhetorical tools to make the argument in the cartoon. pay attention to color, wording, and images in the cartoon as you write.

Well, i think what the picture is trying to say is, the don't prohibit littering, and when you see a red cirlcle with a line over it, its obviously not good. You also notice they use a lot of warm colors in the photo.

i think you really need to revive you answer! : d

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.