When reviewing research on political orientation (conservative, liberal, etc.) you review the instrument most often used to assess it. as you look at the instrument, you notice that many of the issues it asks about have long since been resolved and you wonder whether the instrument really measures political orientation, especially for young adults. you are questioning the instrument's operationality significance validity reliability?

You are questioning the instrument's "validity ".

Validity is the degree to which a concept, end or estimation is very much established and likely compares precisely to this present reality in view of likelihood. "Valid" is gotten from the Latin validus, which means solid. This ought not be mistaken for thoughts of assurance nor need. The legitimacy of an estimation device (for instance, a test in instruction) is thought to be the level of likelihood to which the device estimates what it professes to gauge; for this situation, the legitimacy is a proportional to a percent of how precisely the claim relates to the real world.

european feudalism was a combination of legal and military customs in medieval europe that flourished between the 9th and 15th centuries. broadly defined, it was a way of structuring society around relationships derived from the holding of land in exchange for service or labour.

japanese feudalism. the era of feudalism in japan took place from the 12th through 19th centuries. during that period local rulers, either powerful families or military warlords, dominated the land, while the emperor was merely a figurehead and not a significant political presence.