one reason some argue that campaign financing should be restricted it is because supporting a candidate is considered free speech. the constitution limits the influence of citizens on elections. limitations make the wealthy less influential. restrictions allow for greater influence by fewer corporations.

The answer is: limitations make the wealthy less influential

The wealthy citizens could influence the outcome of the election by funding the campaign of the representatives that they can control. This would help them in term of advertisement and reach more voters. When the number of financing is limited, the wealthy individuals would have less government representatives in their pocket.

jacksonian era promoted strength of the presidency and executive branch at the expense of congress. it also sought to broaden the public's participation in government. the jacksonian's demanded to have elected judges, instead of appointed judges, and rewrote many state constitutions to reflect the new values. hope this ! if you did find it would you mind giving me brainliest? : )