If you are offended and experience revulsion at my eating veal, and i am horrified and repulsed by your eating tofu, or by touching it, is that adequate evidence or an argument that either eating veal or tofu is immoral?

This may be a debate as well but I would like to clarify that:

Revulsion alone at someone else's action is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral (answer to the question)

We do not say eating tofu is obviously morally neutral, so I do not have to ask about harm or good, instead it is not sufficient to argue that it is harmful or immoral.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.

what are the statements.?