What are the main differences between structured analysis, o-o, and agile development methods?

While structured analysis sees procedures and information as isolated segments, object-oriented (O-O) analysis joins information and the procedures that follow up on the information into things called objects. O-O analysis utilizes protest models to show information, conduct, and by what implies objects influence different articles. By portraying the items (information) and techniques (forms) expected to help a business task, a framework engineer can outline reusable segments for quicker framework usage and diminished advancement cost.Numerous experts trust that, contrasted and organized examination, O-O strategies are more adaptable, effective, and reasonable in the present unique business environment. Agile improvement techniques have pulled in a wide after and a whole network of clients.
Agile  strategies ordinarily utilize a winding model, which speaks to a progression of cycles, or revisions,which depend on client criticism. Advocates of the winding model trust that this approach lessens dangers and accelerates programming advancement. Investigators ought to perceive that lithe techniques have points of interest and hindrances. By their tendency, dexterous strategies enable designers to be considerably more adaptable and responsive, however can be less secure than more customary techniques.For instance, without a point by point set of framework necessities, certain highlights asked for by a few clients won't not be predictable with the organization's bigger course of action. Other potential disservices of versatile strategies can incorporate feeble documentation, obscured lines of responsibility, and too little accentuation on the bigger business picture. Additionally, except if legitimately executed, a long arrangement of emphases may really add to extend cost and advancement time.