A community college employs 88 full-time faculty members. To gain the faculty's opinions about an upcoming building project the college president wishes to obtain a simple random sample that will consist of 9 faculty members. He numbers the faculty from 1 to 88. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Click the icon to view the random number table (a) Using the provided random number table, the president doses his eyes and drops his ink pen on the table. It points to the digit in row 3. column 6. Using this position as the starting point and proceeding downward, determine the numbers for the 9 faculty members who will be included in the sample

Loss in amenity , biodiversity , which are most difficult to assess

The paced decision model is a tool that can be used in a variety of situationsit should clarify one's alternative and criteriapaced decision-making processused to solve problems in a rational, systematic way- state the problem- list the alternatives- identify criteria- evaluate alternatives- make a decisionstep 1 - problem: the first step is to state the problem. what car should i buy? step 2 - alternatives: list some likely alternativesstep 3 - criteria: the next step is to establish criteria - what is the most important to you. (these criteria need to be state din positive terms, i.e., stated as you what you want.) ex costs less than $4000; gets at least 25 mpg,; seats at least 4; has ac;   step 4 - evaluate each alternative by comparing it to criterion. if an alternative meets a criterion, pus a + in that box - if not put a -. at the end look to see which alternative meets your most important criteria. (some criteria will be more important than others. those may be given greater weight. and, if an alternative costs more than $4000, it probably won't matter if there is a + in all the other boxes.)step 5 - decide: based on the insights gained, make a choice. be sure to explain that it won't always be the one with the most +'s - since some criteria count more than othersthe strength of this tool lies in the ability of each student to determine their own criteria for evaluation