In any chemical reaction, the mass of the reactants equals the mass if the product. This result forms the basis of the Law of Conservation. which statement correctly explains why this is a law rather than a theory? It has more scientific evidence supporting it.

It has both independent and dependent variables.

It has been tested with the latest laboratory balances, which are very accurate.

It describes a repeatedly observed relationship, but it does not offer an explanation.

The summit of chimborazo, in ecuador, which is at a distance of about 6,384 km from the earth’s center. the bottom of the mariana trench, in the western pacific ocean, which is nearly 6,370 km from the center of the earth. on the surface of earth on the equator line.

Part f - example: finding two forces (part i) two dimensional dynamics often involves solving for two unknown quantities in two separate equations describing the total force. the block in (figure 1) has a mass m=10kg and is being pulled by a force f on a table with coefficient of static friction îľs=0.3. four forces act on it: the applied force f (directed î¸=30â above the horizontal). the force of gravity fg=mg (directly down, where g=9.8m/s2). the normal force n (directly up). the force of static friction fs (directly left, opposing any potential motion). if we want to find the size of the force necessary to just barely overcome static friction (in which case fs=îľsn), we use the condition that the sum of the forces in both directions must be 0. using some basic trigonometry, we can write this condition out for the forces in both the horizontal and vertical directions, respectively, as: fcosî¸â’îľsn=0 fsinî¸+nâ’mg=0 in order to find the magnitude of force f, we have to solve a system of two equations with both f and the normal force n unknown. use the methods we have learned to find an expression for f in terms of m, g, î¸, and îľs (no n).

Which is not true about oxygen-17 and oxygen-18?