Ana is planning to build an electrical circuit Before building it, she writes the statement, "f four batteries are connected to a light bulb, then the light bulb will burn longer than if two batteries are connected because more
battenes provide more energy"
Which best explains why Ana's statement is a hypothesis rather than a theory?
It is based on pror knowledge, but it has not been widely tested on her circuit.
It has been widely tested on her circuit, but it is not a factual statement
It is a factual statement, but it is not based on prior knowledge
It is a testable statement, but it cannot be replaced in the future.

"i have always loved contemporary art and made it a general goal to work within the field. after a few nonprofit internships at museums and galleries, i decided to try the for-profit art world and was offered a job as the ad assistant at the magazine. i much prefer the pace of the for-profit art community and have stayed with the company for three years, with a promotion to an account manager last spring."

i just did this and got a 100.

when two balls of the different masses are dropped from equal height, they reach the ground at the same time .this is because they experience the same acceleration.

the acceleration is independent of mass.

thus when they are dropped they will always maintain the same velocity and travel the same distance (neglect air resistance of course) at the same time.

we have been given a quadratic function and we need to restrict the domain such that it becomes a one to one function.

we know that vertex of this quadratic function occurs at (5,2).

further, we know that range of this function is .

if we restrict the domain of this function to either or , it will become one to one function.

let us know find its inverse.

upon interchanging x and y, we get:

let us now solve this function for y.

hence, the inverse function would be if we restrict the domain of original function to and the inverse function would be if we restrict the domain to .