The "solar nebula hypothesis" offers what explanation for the different compositions of these two types of planets? a. during the collapse of the gaseous nebula, most of the material tended to collect far from the sun because of the large centrifugal forces, which provided the necessary material to build the large jovian planets. b. during condensation, the heavier elements tended to sink nearer the sun and, being rare, only provided enough material to build the relatively small terrestrial planets. c. the terrestrial planets were formed near the sun where, because of the high temperatures, only heavier elements were able to condense. d. the large gravitational forces of jupiter tended to prevent planet formation in the inner solar system and eventually attracted most of the material into the region of the jovian planets.

force is based upon mass and acceleration.the statement is not always true.

it can be explained from newton's second law of motion.

as per newton's second law of motion the rate of change of momentum is directly proportional to the applied force and takes place along the direction of force.

mathematically it can be written as -

                                              ⇒      

here   k is the proportionality constant whose value is 1.

                                                            [a is the acceleration=dv/dt]

hence we see that force not only depends on mass and acceleration but also on velocity and rate of change of mass. force f will depend on mass and acceleration only when mass is constant.

hence the statement that force is based upon mass and acceleration is false.

i believe the answer is electric potential.

explanation: