A1200-ft equal-tangent crest vertical curve is currently designed for 50 mi/h. a civil engineering student contends that 60 mi/h is safe in a van because of the higher driver’s-eye height. if all other design inputs are standard, what must the driver’s-eye height (in the van) be for the student’s claim to be valid?

8.95ft

Explanation:

In order to develop this problem it is necessary to consider two concepts:

The first is the design of vertical curves through the general equation for the length of a curved vertical crest in terms of algebraic differences in grades. The second is the Design Controls for Crest vertical curves table (I attach a table at the end).

The aforementioned equation is given by:

Where,

L = leght of vertical curve

S = Sight distance

A = Algebraic difference in grades

Height of eye above roadway

height of object above roadway surface

From the table we know that for design speed of 60 mi/h the S is 570 ft, while the value of the rate of vertival curve K, for design speed of 50mi/h is 84.

Then we can calculate the Algebraic difference in grades through:

Applying the equation to find we have:

Solving for

Therefore the height of the driver's eye is 8.95ft

okay i have so many questions. but the big one here is: um wt..f is this mess? ?

answer and explanation;