Physics, 25.10.2019 22:43 johnbobjones
Which of the following best explains why we can rule out the idea that planets are usually formed by near collisions between stars?
(a)- studies of the trajectories of nearby stars relative to the sun show that the sun is not in danger of a near collision with any of them.
(b)-stellar near collisions are far too rare to explain all the planets now known to orbit nearby stars.
(c)-a near collision might have created planets, but it could not have created moons, asteroids, or comets.
(d)-a near collision should have left a trail of gas extending out behind the sun, and we see no evidence of such a trail.
Answers: 2
Physics, 22.06.2019 18:00
Which missing item would complete this alpha decay reaction ? > 228/88ra + 4/2he a.224/96 rn b. 232/90 th c. 230/92 u d. 235/92 u
Answers: 2
Physics, 22.06.2019 19:40
It may seem strange that the selected velocity does not depend on either the mass or the charge of the particle. (for example, would the velocity of a neutral particle be selected by passage through this device? ) the explanation of this is that the mass and the charge control the resolution of the device--particles with the wrong velocity will be accelerated away from the straight line and will not pass through the exit slit. if the acceleration depends strongly on the velocity, then particles with just slightly wrong velocities will feel a substantial transverse acceleration and will not exit the selector. because the acc
Answers: 1
Which of the following best explains why we can rule out the idea that planets are usually formed by...
Biology, 26.07.2019 03:30
Biology, 26.07.2019 03:30
History, 26.07.2019 03:30
Mathematics, 26.07.2019 03:30
Physics, 26.07.2019 03:30
Social Studies, 26.07.2019 03:30
Social Studies, 26.07.2019 03:30