subject
Physics, 27.06.2019 15:30 katiemh8302

Do you think companies should be required to disclose ingredients in their chemicals if there are environmental concerns. explain why or why not. use at least three pieces of evidence. to further explain: based on the articles, we know that companies are not legally required to tell us what's in their products. do you think that is okay? do you think they should have to tell us what's in their products if it could be harmful to people or animals?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Physics

question
Physics, 22.06.2019 06:30
Alead ball is dropped into a lake from a diving board 5m above the water . it hits the water with a certain velocity and then sink with constant velocity in bottom . it reaches the bottom 5 second after it is dropped if g= 10m/s2 . find depth of the lake and average velocity of the ball ?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 07:30
Tall pacific coast redwood trees can reach heights of about 100 m. if air drag is negligibly small, how fast is a sequola cone moving when it reaches the ground f it dropped from the top of a 100 m tree?
Answers: 1
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 08:00
Hydrogen and helium are both members of?
Answers: 2
question
Physics, 22.06.2019 15:30
Two point charges are separated by a certain distance. how does the strength of the electric field produced by the first charge, at the position of the second charge, change if the second charge is doubled? a. the field does not change b. the field strength decreases by half. c. the field strength doubles d. the field strength quadruples
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Do you think companies should be required to disclose ingredients in their chemicals if there are en...
Questions
question
Business, 31.08.2020 02:01
Questions on the website: 13722359