Which statement provides the best argument against making major changes to the atmosphere to protect earth’s resources? a. there will be less soil and dust in the air as construction increases. b. the atmosphere will improve as more people move to large cities. c. making major changes to the atmosphere can be a costly process. d. it is more important to protect land and water resources than the atmosphere.

Explanation:

The statement that provides best argument against is option C, because making changes to the atmosphere can be a high cost process, economically or even naturally. The principal fact here is that we don't know what will exactly happen if we tried to apply some things to the atmosphere. For example, cloud bombing, it's not a secret that this action to make rain more often, brought several disasters in many countries, because it was develop without knowing the outcome.

On the other hand, let's say that we know the effects after altering atmosphere to positive outcomes. Probably the cost of the process itself would be huge, while other options could be available.

i think it’s a. this is because if they measured the mass of something with a mass of 150g, then their final answer would have to be approximately 150g. though all of their answers are almost 150, rosa and tran have the closest answers (or the exact answer) to the accurate one.

yup its correct its: c) b b