A mother refused to receive the free immunisation offered by the government for her son because she feels her son already get enough protection by breastfeed. Do you agree with the mother's action?(Evaluating)​

Explanation:

I do not agree with the mother's action because she has to understand that although human milk does provide helpful nutrients along with certian innate immunity to protect the infant, it does not provide immunity against other massive infections that can be fatal for an infant. There's a reason that massive numbers of new borns are vaccinated (with Hep B shots primarily) before they leave the hospital because they do not have strong enough immunity to fight off infections arising from such conditions.  

I do not agree with her actions but unfortunately she is the guardian and she has the right to make decisions for her infant. However, few years back actually, an adult actually sued their parents and won because their parents refused to vaccinate them as child which put the kids at risk.

For more information about vaccines: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd/vaccines-age.html

answer:

it could come from a variety of sources.

explanation:

..although it was most likely developed through zoonotic transmission, where an infectious disease which usually afflicts when animals jump to humans.