Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:00
Rectangle bcde is similar to rectangle vwxy. what is the length of side vy? a) 1 7 b) 2 7 c) 3 7 d) 4 7
Answers: 3
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:30
Which expression demonstrates the use of the commutative property of addition in the first step of simplifying the expression (-1+i)+(21+5i)+0
Answers: 2
Solve the following system of equation x-2y=14 x+3y=9...
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 07:20
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 07:20
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 07:20
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 07:20
English, 05.11.2020 07:20
History, 05.11.2020 07:20
Chemistry, 05.11.2020 07:20
Biology, 05.11.2020 07:20
Social Studies, 05.11.2020 07:20
Mathematics, 05.11.2020 07:20
Chemistry, 05.11.2020 07:20