subject
Mathematics, 15.03.2022 14:00 snoopy112007

Consider the expression below. 1.3 + 1.25 Sarah thinks that this sum will be an irrational number. Is Sarah's classification correct? Why or why not?
A Sarah is not correct, because 1.3 + 1.25 can be rewritten as + which results in the rational sum of 2
B. Sarah is not correct, because 1.3 + 1.25 results in a decimal number and all decimals are rational.
C. Sarah is correct, because 1.25 cannot be rewritten as a fraction which means the sum is irrational.
D.
Sarah is correct, because 1.3 cannot be rewritten as a fraction or terminating decimal which means the sum is
irrational

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:50
What is the next step in the given proof? choose the most logical approach. a. statement: m 1 + m 2 + 2(m 3) = 180Ā° reason: angle addition b. statement: m 1 + m 3 = m 2 + m 3 reason: transitive property of equality c. statement: m 1 = m 2 reason: subtraction property of equality d. statement: m 1 + m 2 = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality e. statement: 2(m 1) = m 2 + m 3 reason: substitution property of equality
Answers: 3
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:00
How can i differentiate this equation?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 03:30
Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume v generated by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about y = 8.8y = x3, y = 0, x = 4use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume v generated by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about y = 8.8y = x3, y = 0, x = 4
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 05:00
Lena draws a square with an area that is greater than the area of rectangle b. what are two possible side lengths of lena's square? explain.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Consider the expression below. 1.3 + 1.25 Sarah thinks that this sum will be an irrational number....
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367