Stella has $500 to spend at a bicycle store for some new gear and biking outfits. Assume all prices listed include tax.
• She buys a new bicycle for $402.96.
• She buys 3 bicycle reflectors for $4.56 each and a pair of bike gloves for $28.21.
• She plans to spend some or all of the money she has left to buy new biking outfits
for $65.69 each
Which inequality can be used to determine o, the maximum number of outfits Stella
can purchase while staying within her budget

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

you bought 31 v bucks

step-by-step explanation:

25+6=31