subject
Mathematics, 22.09.2021 01:00 Jehovel

Fifty-four wild bears were​ anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and listed in a data set. Results are shown in the accompanying display. Is there sufficient evidence to support the claim that there is a linear correlation between the weights of bears and their chest​ sizes? When measuring an anesthetized​ bear, is it easier to measure chest size than​ weight? If​ so, does it appear that a measured chest size can be used to predict the​ weight? Use a significance level of a = 0.05 Correlation Results
Correlation​ coeff, r.0.958433
Critical​ r: ±0.2680855
P-value (two​ tailed): 0.000

H0​:

ρ


less than
<
greater than
>
not equals

equals
=

nothing

H1​:

ρ


equals
=
less than
<
not equals

greater than
>
nothing
​(Type integers or decimals. Do not​ round.)

If you can please help thank you!

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 19:30
How are sas and sss used to show that two triangles are congruent?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:40
The roots of the function f(x) = x2 – 2x – 3 are shown. what is the missing number?
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 21:50
Which graph depicts the path of a projectile
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 23:20
What is the slope of the line that contains the points (-5, 6) and (14. - 7)?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Fifty-four wild bears were​ anesthetized, and then their weights and chest sizes were measured and l...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 14:00
question
Physics, 02.02.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 02.02.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722360