C is the incenter of isosceles triangle ABD with vertex angle ∠ABD. Does the following proof correctly justify that triangles ABC and DBC are congruent? It is given that C is the incenter of triangle ABD, so segment BC is an altitude of angle ABD. Angles ABC and DBC are congruent according to the definition of an angle bisector. Segments AB and DB are congruent by the definition of an isosceles triangle. Triangles ABC and DBC share side BC, so it is congruent to itself by the reflexive property. By the SAS postulate, triangles ABC and DBC are congruent. Triangle ABD with segments BC, DC, and AC drawn from each vertex and meeting at point C inside triangle ABD. There is an error in line 1; segment BC should be an angle bisector. The proof is correct. There is an error in line 3; segments AB and BC are congruent. There is an error in line 5; the ASA Postulate should be used.

you forgot the options, but i found them anyways, the correct answer is "john wilson believes that words and actions based on the intellect are superior to those based on emotions".

john wilson is depicted as an extremely intelligent man. the point of the excerpt is to make a sort of distinction between emotional and rational intelligence. he happens to have both attributes, but he clearly favors his intellectual gifts. at the same time, because of his religious background, he's a little bit conflicted with this and it makes him ashamed.

hope this !

could u provide us some answer choices or hmm idk maybe a table for us to anser with ? ?

2x+60=

step-by-step explanation:

in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶

step-by-step explanation:

population of los angeles = 3.79 × 10⁶

population of california = 9.84 × population of los angeles

                                        = 9.84 × 3.79 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.2936 × 10⁶

                                        = 37.29 × 10⁶

∴ in 2010, the population of the state of california is 37.29 × 10⁶