Which statement best explains whether Δ ABC is congruent to Δ DEF? Question 10 options:

ΔABC is not congruent to ΔDEF because there is no sequence of rigid motions that maps ΔABC to ΔDEF.

ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a reflection across the y-axis followed by a translation 5 units down.

ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a translation 5 units down followed by a reflection across the x-axis.

ΔABC is congruent to ΔDEF because ΔABC can be mapped to ΔDEF by a translation 5 units down.

is congruent to because can be mapped to by a reflection across the -axis followed by a translation units down.

answer: the price of one pound cabbage = $ 0.8

the point (10,8) represents that the cost of 10 pounds cabbage is $ 8

step-by-step explanation:

since, here is a proportional relation between the number of pounds of cabbage (x) and the price in dollars (y).

therefore, we can write,

⇒ y = k x

where k is the constant of proportionality.

now, point (5,4) is in the line.

thus, it will satisfies the above equation of line.

⇒ 4 = 5 k

⇒ k = 0.8

thus, the equation of the line is,

y = 0.8 x

a) for x = 1,

y = 0.8

therefore, the cost of one pound of cabbage is 0.8 dollars.

b) in the below graph (10,8) represents that the cost of 10 pounds of cabbage is 8 dollars.