Tonya and Pearl each completed a separate proof to show that alternate interior angles AKL and FLK are congruent. Who completed the proof incorrectly? Explain.

21/58.

hope to be marked brainliest

option (b) is correct

step-by-step explanation:

to find the solution of this system, we need to convert it into reduced row-echelon form. we have,

after applying row operations r2 -> r2/2 and r3 -> r3/3, we get,

the solution is x=1

step-by-step explanation:

we are given our   equation as

let's assume

left side function is

right side function is

now, we can draw graph

and then we can get intersection point

the intersection point will be solution

so, the solution is

x=1