Suppose your friend also proved correctly that 1 =2 The difference is that your friend did not use the perpendicular
Transversal Theorem. Determine how your friend was able to prove
the same statement using a different approach​

395.84

step-by-step explanation:

2πrh+2πr²

2 (pie)(radius)(height)+2(pie)(radius)^2

you cant answer this dummy

step-by-step explanation:

10 you would take 50/ .2

step-by-step explanation:

the ratio of balloons to tables is 5: 2 and the constant variation is 5.

the equation is y=5x