Write your own definition for similarity that does not allow congruent figures to also be called similar. How does this definition for similarity relate to rigid transformations, dilations, and scale factors?

a. Explain whether rigid transformations would be considered similarity transformations.

b. Explain what dilations and scale factors would be considered similarity transformations.

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

step-by-step explanation:

given   that triangle lno is congruent to triangle lnm.

we have to fill up the blanks in the given question.

according to above order of congruency   kept in mind we can say that

∠lno ≅ ∠lnm

∠oln ≅ ∠mln

ln ≅ ln due to common in both.

hence, by sas congruency,

the side angle side rule   states that if two sides and the included angle of one triangle are congruent to another triangle, then these two triangles are congruent.

d. vertex

step-by-step explanation:

that is the sum

step-by-step explanation:

there are no other answers without knowing the variables values

he will have 300 because he is really broke and 300 is in his imangine

step-by-step explanation: he ehe heh step by the thy