A biologist was interested in determining whether sunflower seedlings treated with and an extract from Vinca minor roots resulted in a lower average height of sunflower seedlings that the standard height of 15.7 cm. The biologist treated a random sample of 33 seedlings with the extract and subsequently measured the height of those seedlings. At the 0.01 significance level, is there evidence that the true average height of the seedlings treated with an extract from Vinca minor roots is less than 15.7 cm? Height
15.5
15.8
15.7
15.1
15.1
15.5
15.2
15.7
15.8
15.4
16.2
15.5
16.2
15.5
15.4
16.3
14.9
15.3
15.1
16.1
15.3
15.4
15.1
15.3
14.6
15.1
15.0
15.3
15.8
15.5
14.8
15.2
14.8

a. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
b. Report the value of the test statistic. Round answer to 2 decimal places. (Either calculate or use software such as minitab)
c. Using the p-value, do you reject the null hypothesis or fail to reject the null hypothesis? Explain your decision.
d. Based on your decision in part (c), write a conclusion within the context of the problem.

Kindly check explanation

Step-by-step explanation:

H0 : μ = 15.7

H1 : μ < 15.7

This is a one sample t test :

Test statistic = (xbar - μ) ÷ (s/√(n))

n = sample size = 33

Using calculator :

The sample mean, xbar = 15.41

The sample standard deviation, s = 0.419

Test statistic = (15.41 - 15.70) ÷ (0.419/√(33))

Test statistic = - 3.976

Using the Pvalue calculator :

Degree of freedom, df = n - 1 ; 33 - 1 = 32

Pvalue(-3.976, 32) = 0.000187

Decison region :

Reject H0 if Pvalue < α

Since Pvalue < α ; we reject H0

There is significant evidence to conclude that the true average height of the seedlings treated with an extract from Vinca minor roots is less than 15.7 cm.

-232

step-by-step explanation:

so firstly, we need to isolate the y variables to be able to solve these inequalities. firstly, add 0.5x on both sides of the first inequality and subtract 1.5x on both sides of the second inequality:

now since the slope is positive for the first inequality, this means that the line going upwards belongs to the first inequality, and the line going downwards belongs to the second inequality.

next, since y ≥ in the first inequality, this means that the shaded region will be above the first inequality's line, thus shading regions a and b.

next, since y ≤ in the second inequality, this means that the shaded region is going to be below this line, thus shading regions a and c.

since both lines shade region a, this means that region a is the solution.

step-by-step explanation:

mark brainliest!