Surface roughness of pipe. Refer to the Anti-corrosion Methods and Materials (Vol. 50, 2003) study of the sur- face roughness of coated interior pipe used in oil fields, Exercise 7.26 (p. 311). The data (in micrometers) for 20 sampled pipe sections are reproduced in the table on p. 391. a. Give the null and alternative hypotheses for testing whether the mean surface roughness of coated interior pipe, H, differs from 2 micrometers.
b. The results of the test, part a, are shown in the MINITAB printout at the bottom of the page. Locate the test statistic and p-value on the printout.

The minitab report isn't given.

H0 : μ = 2 um

H1 : μ ≠ 2 um

Step-by-step explanation:

The mean surface roughness of coated interior pipe is given as 2um.

This refers to the population mean, μ = 2 um

Therefore, the null hypothesis which usually aligns with the population mean value will be stated as :

H0 : μ = 2 um

The alternative hypothesis is used to test the claim that the mean surface roughness is different from 2 ; hence no direction is given, this is thus a 2 - tailed test

H1 : μ ≠ 2 um

lockers 1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 40, and 49 are open

i ran through it by the other answer is wrong

the answer is (-8,-5)

step-by-step explanation:

the endpoint to midpoint is half the length. the length is (-2,-1) so when you are at the midpoint just add it to it to find your answer -6+(-2)= -8 and -4+(-1)=-5 so (-8,-5)