Sarah converts the number 1,500,600 into scientific notation. She writes 1.5006 x 104. Which of the following statements is true? Sarah is not correct because the exponent should be -4.
Sarah is correct.
Sarah is not correct because 1.5006 should be 1.5.
Sarah is not correct because the exponent should be 6.

their is no graph showing

step-by-step explanation:

d) by the cross product property, ab^2 = bc multiplied by ad

step-by-step explanation:

we are given

in the given triangle abc

angle a is 90° and segment ad is perpendicular to segment bc

we can see that

triangle(abc) and triangle(abd) are similar because they have common side and same angle (90 degree)

so, triangles(abc) and abd are similar

since, they are similar

so, the ratio of their sides must be equal

we get

now, we can cross multiply

and we get

so, this could be step to prove it

no association

step-by-step explanation:

if you have eyes and you can use them efficiently you can see that it just looks like random dots like do a line of best fit and like they're so spread out it's such a weak association you might as well consider it nonexistent