The highway department is testing two types of reflecting paint for concrete bridge end pillars. The two kinds of paint are alike in every respect except that one other is yellow. The orange paint is applied to 12 bridges, and the yellow paint is applied to 12 bridges. After a period of 1 year, reflectometer readings were made end pillars. (A higher reading means better visibility.) For the orange paint, the mean reflectometer reading was x19.4, with standard deviation s1-2.5. For the mean was X2-6.5, with standard deviation S2-2.4. Based on these data, can we conclude that the yellow paint has less visibility after 1 year? Use a 10% level What are we testing in this problem?
a. difference of means
b. single proportion
c. difference of proportions
d. single mean
e. paired difference

a. difference of means

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that :

Mean , x = 9.4

Standard deviation, = 2.5

Number, = 12

Mean, y = 6.5

standard deviation, = 2.4

Number, = 12

The null hypothesis is :

The alternate hypothesis is :

Level of significance, = 0.1

From the = 1.363

Since out test is right tailed.

Reject , if

We use the test statics,

The value of with minimum that is 11 df is 1.363

We go and = 1.363

Decision making:

Since the value of  and we reject the

The p-value : right tail

                                      = 0.00724

Therefore the value of , and so we reject the

Thus we are testing 'the difference of means" in this problem.

option 2 is correct.

step-by-step explanation:

we are given two inequality equation

x+y> 5 and -3x+2y< -2

first we draw the graph of both function using t-table method

equation: x+y> 5

for x=0, y=5

for x=-5, y=0

table:

x   :   0     5

y   :   5     0

test point (0,0) , 0> 5

false

equation: -3x+2y< -2

for x=0, y=-1

for x=2, y=4

table:

x   :   0     2

y   : -1       4

test point (0,0) , 0< -2

true

now we draw the graph. see the attachment for graph.

common region would be solution set.

option 2 is correct.

the car was traveling 40 mph before it started skidding. ( 2 points ) 17. was the driver were her brakes working at 75% efficiency or better? ( 2 points ) yes 29.

step-by-step explanation: