A random sample of 35 employees of the local green technologies plant Greenies, who completed two years of college, were asked to take a basic mathematics test. The mean and standard deviation of their scores were 75.1 and 12.8, respectively. In a random sample of 50 employees who had only completed high school, the mean and standard deviation of the test scores were 72.1 and 14.6, respectively. Assuming equal variance between the two populations, can we infer at the .10 level of significance that students who completed two years of college had a higher average than students who had only completed high school

There is no significance evidence that students who completed two years of college had a higher average than students who had only completed high school.

Step-by-step explanation:

The hypothesis :

H0 : μ1 = μ2

H1 : μ1 > μ2

Given :

n1 = 35 ; x1 = 75.1 ; s1 = 12.8

n2 = 50 ; x2 = 72.1 ; s2 = 14.6

Pooled variance = Sp² = (df1*s1² + df2*s2²) ÷ (n1 + n2 - 2)

df1 = n1 - 1 = 35 - 1 = 34

df2 = n2 - 1 = 50 - 1 = 49

(x1 - x2) ÷ Sp(√(1/n1 + 1/n2))

Sp² = (34*12.8^2 + 49*14.6^2) / (35+50-2)

Sp² = (5570.56 + 10444.84) / 83

Sp² = 192.95662

Sp = √192.95662

Sp = 13.89

Test statistic = (75.1 - 72.1) / 13.89 * √(1/35 + 1/50)

Test statistic = 3 / (13.89 * 0.2203892)

Test statistic = 0.980

df = n1 + n2 - 2

df = 35 + 50 - 2 = 83

Using the Pvalue calculator :

Pvalue(0.980, 83) = 0.165

α = 0.1

Pvalue > α ; We fail to reject the H0; and conclude that there is no significance evidence that students who completed two years of college had a higher average than students who had only completed high school.